Commercial Courts Act, 2015
[Act 4 of 2016 as amended upto Act 28 of 2018] ???????????????[31st December, 2015]
An Act to provide for the constitution
of Commercial Courts,[1] [Commercial Appellate Courts,] Commercial
Divisionand Commercial Appellate Division in the High Courts for adjudicating
commercial disputes of specified value and matters connected therewith or
incidental thereto
Be it enacted by Parliament in the
Sixty-sixth Year of the Republic of India as follows?
Statement of Objects and Reasons.?
1.
The
proposal to provide for speedy disposal of high value commercial disputes has
been under consideration of the Government for quite some time. The high value
commercial disputes involve complex facts and question of law. Therefore, there
is a need to provide for an independent mechanism for their early resolution.
Early resolution of commercial disputes shall create a positive image to the
investor world about the independent and responsive Indian legal system.
2.
The
Law Commission of India in its 188th Report had recommended the constitution of
the Commercial Division in each High Court. Accordingly, the Commercial
Division of High Courts Bill, 2009, was introduced and passed by the Lok Sabha.
However, during the discussion of the aforesaid Bill in the Rajya Sabha, some
members raised certain issues and in view thereof, the matter was again
referred to the Law Commission of India for its examination.
The Law Commission of India, in its 253rd Report,
has recommended for the establishment of the Commercial Courts, the Commercial
Division and the Commercial Appellate Divisions in the High Courts for disposal
of commercial disputes of specified value.
3.
Based
on the recommendations of the Law Commission made in its 253rd Report, a Bill
namely, the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate
Division of High Courts Bill, 2015, was introduced in the Rajya Sabha on 24th
April, 2015 and the same is at present under the consideration of the department
related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, Law
and Justice. As provided in the said Bill, 2015, all the suits, appeals or
applications related to commercial disputes of specified value i.e. one crore
or above, are to be dealt with by the Commercial Courts or the Commercial
Division of the High Court.
4.
By
way of the Delhi High Court (Amendment) Act, 2015, the ordinary original
jurisdiction of the Delhi High Court has been increased from Rupees Twenty
lakhs to Rupees Two crore and there is a provision for transfer of pending case
from the Delhi High Court to District Courts. On the enactment of Commercial
Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts
Bill, 2015, some of the Commercial Disputes which are to be transferred to the
District Courts from the Delhi High Court may again be required to be
transferred to the Commercial Division of the High Court of Delhi. It would
cause delay in the disposal of cases as well as inconvenience to the parties
and counsels and may also result in confusion. Therefore, it became necessary
that the provisions of the Delhi High Court (Amendment) Act, 2015 and
establishment of the Commercial Courts and Commercial Division of the High
Courts may be brought into force simultaneously.
5.
As
Parliament was not in session and urgent steps were needed to be taken, the
Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division in
High Courts Ordinance, 2015, was promulgated on 23rd October, 2015.
6.
It
is proposed to introduced the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and
Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Bill, 2015, to replace the
Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of
High Courts Ordinance, 2015, which inter alia, provides for the following
namely?
(i)
constitution
of the Commercial Courts at District Level except for the territory over which
any High Court is having ordinary original civil jurisdiction;
(ii)
constitution
of the Commercial Divisions in those High Courts which are already exercising
ordinary civil jurisdiction and they shall have territorial jurisdiction over
such areas on which it has original jurisdiction;
(iii)
constitution
of the Commercial Appellate Division in all the High Courts to hear the appeals
against the orders of the Commercial Courts and the orders of the Commercial
Division of the High Court;
(iv)
the
minimum pecuniary jurisdiction of such Commercial Courts and Commercial
Division is proposed as one crore rupees; and
(v)
to
amend the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, as applicable to the Commercial Courts
and Commercial Divisions which shall prevail over the existing High Courts
Rules and other provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, so as to
improve the efficiency and reduce delays in disposal of commercial cases.
7.
The
proposed Bill shall accelerate economic growth, improve the international image
of the Indian Justice delivery system, and the faith of the investor world in
the legal culture of the nation.
8.
The
Bill seeks to replace the aforesaid Ordinance.
Statement of Objects and Reasons of Amendment Act 28 of 2018.?
1.
The Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and
Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015, was enacted for the
constitution of Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate
Division in the High Courts for adjudicating commercial disputes of specified
value and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.
2.
The global economic environment has since become increasingly
competitive and to attract business at international level, India needs to
further improve its ranking in the World Bank ?Doing Business Report? which,
inter alia, considers the dispute resolution environment in the country as one
of the parameters for doing business. Further, the tremendous economic
development has ushered in enormous commercial activities in the country
including foreign direct investments, public private partnership, etc., which
has prompted initiating legislative measures for speedy settlement of
commercial disputes, widen the scope of the courts to deal with commercial
disputes and facilitate ease of doing business. Needless to say that early
resolution of commercial disputes of even lesser value creates a positive image
amongst the investors about the strong and responsive Indian legal system. It
is, therefore, proposed to amend the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and
Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015.
3.
As Parliament was not in session and immediate
action was required to be taken to make necessary amendments in the Commercial
Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts
Act, 2015, to further improve India's ranking in the ?Doing Business Report?,
the President promulgated the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and
Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts (Amendment) Ordinance, 2018, on
3rd May, 2018.
4.
It is proposed to introduce the Commercial Courts,
Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts
(Amendment) Bill, 2018, to replace the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division
and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts (Amendment) Ordinance, 2018,
which inter alia, provides for the following namely?
(i)
to reduce the specified value of commercial
disputes from the existing one crore rupees to three lakh rupees, and to enable
the parties to approach the lowest level of subordinate courts for speedy
resolution of commercial disputes;
(ii)
to enable the State Governments, with respect to
the High Courts having ordinary original civil jurisdiction, to constitute
commercial courts at District Judge level and to specify such pecuniary value
of commercial disputes which shall not be less than three lakh rupees and not
more than the pecuniary jurisdiction of the district courts;
(iii)
to enable the State Governments, except the
territories over which the High Courts have ordinary original civil
jurisdiction, to designate such number of Commercial Appellate Courts at
district judge level to exercise the appellate jurisdiction over the commercial
courts below the district judge level;
(iv)
to enable the State Governments to specify such
pecuniary value of a commercial dispute which shall not be less than three lakh
rupees or such higher value, for the whole or part of the State; and
(v)
to provide for compulsory mediation before
institution of a suit, where no urgent interim relief is contemplated and for
this purpose, to introduce the Pre-Institution Mediation and Settlement
Mechanism and to enable the Central Government to authorise the authorities
constituted under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, for this purpose.
5.
The Bill seeks to achieve the above objectives.
Chapter I
PRELIMINARY
1. Short title, extent and commencement.?
[2] [(1) ?This
Act may be called the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.]
(2) ???It
extends to the whole of India, [3]
[* * *].
(3) ?It shall be deemed to have come into force on
the 23rd day of October, 2015.
2. Definitions.?
(1)
In
this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,?
[4] [(a) ?Commercial Appellate Courts? means
the Commercial Appellate Courts designated under Section 3-A;]
[5] [(aa)] ?Commercial Appellate Division?
means the Commercial Appellate Division in a High Court constituted under
sub-section (1) of Section 5;
(b) ??Commercial Court? means the Commercial Court
constituted under sub-section (1) of Section 3;
(c) ???commercial dispute? means a dispute arising
out of?
(i) ordinary transactions of merchants, bankers,
financiers and traders such as those relating to mercantile documents,
including enforcement and interpretation of such documents;
(ii) export or import of merchandise or services;
(iii) issues relating to admiralty and maritime law;
(iv) transactions relating to aircraft, aircraft
engines, aircraft equipment and helicopters, including sales, leasing and
financing of the same;
(v) carriage of goods;
(vi) construction and infrastructure contracts,
including tenders;
(vii) agreements relating to immovable property used
exclusively in trade or commerce;
(viii) franchising agreements;
(ix) distribution and licensing agreements;
(x) management and consultancy agreements;
(xi) joint venture agreements;
(xii) shareholders agreements;
(xiii) subscription and investment agreements pertaining
to the services industry including outsourcing services and financial services;
(xiv) mercantile agency and mercantile usage;
(xv) partnership agreements;
(xvi) technology development agreements;
(xvii) intellectual property rights relating to registered
and unregistered trademarks, copyright, patent, design, domain names,
geographical indications and semiconductor integrated circuits;
(xviii) agreements for sale of goods or provision of
services;
(xix) exploitation of oil and gas reserves or other
natural resources including electromagnetic spectrum;
(xx) insurance and re-insurance;
(xxi) contracts of agency relating to any of the above;
and
(xxii) such other commercial disputes as may be notified
by the Central Government.
Explanation.?A commercial dispute shall not cease to be a
commercial dispute merely because?
(a) it also involves action for recovery of immovable
property or for realisation of monies out of immovable property given as
security or involves any other relief pertaining to immovable property;
(b) one of the contracting parties is the State or any
of its agencies or instrumentalities, or a private body carrying out public
functions;
(c) ?Commercial Division? means the Commercial Division
in a High Court constituted under sub-section (1) of Section 4;
(d) ?District Judge? shall have the same meaning as
assigned to it in clause (a) of Article 236 of the Constitution of
India;
(e) ?document? means any matter expressed or described
upon any substance by means of letters, figures or marks, or electronic means,
or by more than one of those means, intended to be used, or which may be used,
for the purpose of recording that matter;
(f) ?notification? means a notification published in
the Official Gazette and the expression ?notify? with its cognate meanings and
grammatical variations shall be construed accordingly;
(g) ?Schedule? means the Schedule appended to the Act;
and
(h) ?Specified Value?, in relation to a commercial
dispute, shall mean the value of the subject-matter in respect of a suit as
determined in accordance with Section 12 [6]
[which shall not be less than three lakh rupees] rupees or such higher value,
as may be notified by the Central Government.?.
(2) The words and expressions used and not defined in
this Act but defined in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) and the
Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872), shall have the same meanings
respectively assigned to them in that Code and the Act.
? Commercial dispute.?A
commercial dispute, within the meaning of Section 2(1)(c)(vii)
of the Act, would be a dispute in respect of the agreements relating to
immovable property, used exclusively in trade or commerce, Madhuram
Properties v. Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., 2017
SCC OnLine Guj 725 : (2017) 58 (4) GLR 3327. |
Chapter II
[7] [COMMERCIAL COURTS,
COMMERCIAL APPELLATE COURTS, COMMERCIAL DIVISIONS AND COMMERCIAL APPELLATE
DIVISIONS]
3. Constitution of Commercial Courts.?
(1)
The
State Government, may after consultation with the concerned High Court, by notification,
constitute such number of Commercial Courts at District level, as it may deem
necessary for the purpose of exercising the jurisdiction and powers conferred
on those courts under this Act:
[8] [Provided that with respect to the High Courts
having ordinary original civil jurisdiction, the State Government may, after
consultation with the concerned High Court, by notification, constitute
Commercial Courts at the District Judge level:
Provided further that with respect to a territory
over which the High Courts have ordinary original civil jurisdiction, the State
Government may, by notification, specify such pecuniary value which shall not
be less than three lakh rupees and not more than the pecuniary jurisdiction
exercisable by the District Courts, as it may consider necessary.]
[9] [(1-A) Notwithstanding anything contained in this
Act, the State Government may, after consultation with the concerned High
Court, by notification, specify such pecuniary value which shall not be less
than three lakh rupees or such higher value, for whole or part of the State, as
it may consider necessary.]
(2) The State Government shall, after consultation,
with the concerned High Court specify, by notification, the local limits of the
area to which the jurisdiction of a Commercial Court shall extend and may, from
time to time, increase, reduce or alter such limits.
(3) The [10]
[State Government may], with the concurrence of the Chief Justice of the High
Court appoint one or more persons having experience in dealing with commercial
disputes to be the Judge or Judges, of a [11]
[Commercial Court either at the level of District Judge or a court below the
level of a District Judge].
[12] [3-A. Designation of Commercial Appellate Courts.?
Except the territories over which the High Courts
have ordinary original civil jurisdiction, the State Government may, after
consultation with the concerned High Court, by notification, designate such
number of Commercial Appellate Courts at District Judge level, as it may deem
necessary, for the purposes of exercising the jurisdiction and powers conferred
on those Courts under this Act.]
4. Constitution of Commercial Division of High Court.?
(1) In all High Courts, having [13]
[ordinary original civil jurisdiction], the Chief Justice of the High Court
may, by order, constitute Commercial Division having one or more Benches
consisting of a Single Judge for the purpose of exercising the jurisdiction and
powers conferred on it under this Act.
(2) The Chief Justice of the High Court shall nominate
such Judges of the High Court who have experience in dealing with commercial
disputes to be Judges of the Commercial Division.
5. Constitution of Commercial Appellate Division.?
(1) After issuing notification under sub-section (1) of
Section 3 or order under sub-section (1) of Section 4, the Chief Justice of the
concerned High Court shall, by order, constitute Commercial Appellate Division
having one or more Division Benches for the purpose of exercising the
jurisdiction and powers conferred on it by the Act.
(2) The Chief Justice of the High Court shall nominate
such Judges of the High Court who have experience in dealing with commercial
disputes to be Judges of the Commercial Appellate Division.
6. Jurisdiction of Commercial Court.?
The Commercial Court shall have jurisdiction to try
all suits and applications relating to a commercial dispute of a Specified
Value arising out of the entire territory of the State over which it has been
vested territorial jurisdiction.
Explanation.?For the purposes of this section, a commercial
dispute shall be considered to arise out of the entire territory of the State
over which a Commercial Court has been vested jurisdiction, if the suit or
application relating to such commercial dispute has been instituted as per the
provisions of Sections 16 to 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of
1908).
7. Jurisdiction of Commercial Divisions of High Courts.?
All suits and applications relating to commercial
disputes of a Specified Value filed in a High Court having ordinary original
civil jurisdiction shall be heard and disposed of by the Commercial Division of
that High Court:
Provided that all suits and applications relating
to commercial disputes, stipulated by an Act to lie in a court not inferior to
a District Court, and filed or pending on the original side of the High Court,
shall be heard and disposed of by the Commercial Division of the High Court:
Provided further that all suits and applications
transferred to the High Court by virtue of sub-section (4) of Section 22 of the
Designs Act, 2000 (16 of 2000) or Section 104 of the Patents Act, 1970 (39 of
1970) shall be heard and disposed of by the Commercial Division of the High
Court in all the areas over which the High Court exercises ordinary original
civil jurisdiction.
8. Bar against revision application or petition against an interlocutory order.?
Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law
for the time being in force, no civil revision application or petition shall be
entertained against any interlocutory order of a Commercial Court, including an
order on the issue of jurisdiction, and any such challenge, subject to the
provisions of Section 13, shall be raised only in an appeal against the decree
of the Commercial Court.
9. Transfer of suit if counter-claim in a commercial dispute is of Specified Value.?
[14] [* * *]
10. Jurisdiction in respect of arbitration matters.?
Where the subject-matter of an arbitration is a commercial
dispute of a specified value and?
(1)
If
such arbitration is an international commercial arbitration, all applications
or appeals arising out of such arbitration under the provisions of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (26 of 1996) that have been filed in a
High Court, shall be heard and disposed of by the Commercial Division where
such Commercial Division has been constituted in such High Court.
(2)
If
such arbitration is other than an international commercial arbitration, all
applications or appeals arising out of such arbitration under the provisions of
the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (26 of 1996) that have been filed on
the original side of the High Court, shall be heard and disposed of by the
Commercial Division where such Commercial Division has been constituted in such
High Court.
(3)
If
such arbitration is other than an international commercial arbitration, all
applications or appeals arising out of such arbitration under the provisions of
the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (26 of 1996) that would ordinarily
lie before any principal civil court of original jurisdiction in a district
(not being a High Court) shall be filed in, and heard and disposed of by the
Commercial Court exercising territorial jurisdiction over such arbitration
where such Commercial Court has been constituted.
11. Bar of jurisdiction of Commercial Courts and Commercial Divisions.?
Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, a
Commercial Court or a Commercial Division shall not entertain or decide any
suit, application or proceedings relating to any commercial dispute in respect
of which the jurisdiction of the civil court is either expressly or impliedly
barred under any other law for the time being in force.
Chapter III
SPECIFIED
VALUE
12. Determination of Specified Value.?
(1)
The
Specified Value of the subject-matter of the commercial dispute in a suit,
appeal or application shall be determined in the following manner?
(a)
where
the relief sought in a suit or application is for recovery of money, the money
sought to be recovered in the suit or application inclusive of interest, if
any, computed up to the date of filing of the suit or application, as the case
may be, shall be taken into account for determining such specified value;
(b)
where
the relief sought in a suit, appeal or application relates to movable property
or to a right therein, the market value of the movable property as on the date
of filing of the suit, appeal or application, as the case may be, shall be
taken into account for determining such specified value;
(c)
where
the relief sought in a suit, appeal or application relates to immovable
property or to a right therein, the market value of the immovable property, as
on the date of filing of the suit, appeal or application, as the case may be,
shall be taken into account for determining specified value; [15]
[and]
(d)
where
the relief sought in a suit, appeal or application relates to any other
intangible right, the market value of the said rights as estimated by the
plaintiff shall be taken into account for determining specified value; [16]
[* * *]
(e)
[17] [* * *]
(2)
The
aggregate value of the claim and counter-claim, if any, as set out in the
statement of claim and the counter-claim, if any, in an arbitration of a
commercial dispute shall be the basis for determining whether such arbitration
is subject to the jurisdiction of a Commercial Division, Commercial Appellate
Division or Commercial Court, as the case may be.
(3)
No
appeal or civil revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil
Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), as the case may be, shall lie from an order of a
Commercial Division or Commercial Court finding that it has jurisdiction to
hear a commercial dispute under this Act.
[18] [Chapter III-A
PRE-INSTITUTION
MEDIATION AND SETTLEMENT
12-A. Pre-Institution Mediation and Settlement.?
(1)
A
suit, which does not contemplate any urgent interim relief under this Act,
shall not be instituted unless the plaintiff exhausts the remedy of
pre-institution mediation in accordance with such manner and procedure as may
be prescribed by rules made by the Central Government.
(2)
The
Central Government may, by notification, authorise the Authorities constituted
under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (39 of 1987), for the purposes
of pre-institution mediation.
NOTIFICATION
Noti. No. S.O. 3232(E), dated July
3, 2018.?In exercise of the powers
conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 12-A of the Commercial Courts Act,
2015, the Central Government hereby authorises the State Authority and District
Authority constituted under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (39 of
1987), for the purposes of pre-institution mediation and settlement under
Chapter IIIA of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
(3)
Notwithstanding
anything contained in the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (39 of 1987),
the Authority authorised by the Central Government under sub-section (2) shall
complete the process of mediation within a period of three months from the date
of application made by the plaintiff under sub-section (1):
Provided that the period of mediation may be
extended for a further period of two months with the consent of the parties:
Provided further that, the period during which the
parties remained occupied with the pre-institution mediation, such period shall
not be computed for the purpose of limitation under the Limitation Act, 1963
(36 of 1963).
(4)
If
the parties to the commercial dispute arrive at a settlement, the same shall be
reduced into writing and shall be signed by the parties to the dispute and the
mediator.
(5)
The
settlement arrived at under this section shall have the same status and effect
as if it is an arbitral award on agreed terms under sub-section (4) of Section
30 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (26 of 1996).]
Chapter IV
APPEALS
13. Appeals from decrees of Commercial Courts and Commercial Divisions.?
[19] [(1) Any person aggrieved by the judgment or order
of a Commercial Court below the level of a District Judge may appeal to the
Commercial Appellate Court within a period of sixty days from the date of
judgment or order.
(1-A) Any person aggrieved by the
judgment or order of a Commercial Court at the level of District Judge
exercising original civil jurisdiction or, as the case may be, Commercial
Division of a High Court may appeal to the Commercial Appellate Division of
that High Court within a period of sixty days from the date of the judgment or
order:
Provided that an appeal shall lie from such orders
passed by a Commercial Division or a Commercial Court that are specifically
enumerated under Order XLIII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908)
as amended by this Act and Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,
1996 (26 of 1996).]
(2) ??Notwithstanding anything contained in any
other law for the time being in force or Letters Patent of a High Court, no
appeal shall lie from any order or decree of a Commercial Division or
Commercial Court otherwise than in accordance with the provisions of this Act.
|
? Scope and object of
proviso to Section 13(1).?Section 13(1) of the Commercial Courts Act is
in two parts. The main provision is a provision which provides for appeals
from judgments, orders and decrees of the Commercial Division of the High
Court. To this main provision, an exception is carved out by the proviso. The
primary purpose of a proviso is to qualify the generality of the main part by
providing an exception, Kandla Export Corporation v. OCI
Corpn., 2018 SCC OnLine SC 170. ? Commercial Appeal ?
Maintainability.?Appeal under Section 13 is maintainable once suits,
petitions applications and appeals are transferred and treated as commercial
disputes having specified value. Where Commercial Division Judge has taken
decision and/or passed ?judgment? and/or ?order? or ?decree?. Appeal against
any final decision include judgment so passed by Commercial Court and/or
Commercial Division. Proviso to Section 13(1) will not be applicable to such
decision/judgment as proviso refers to ?orders?. However Appeal under Section
13(1) even if there is an order but which has a tinge of judgment. Appeal
under Section 13 against such order being a ?judgment? within meaning of CPC
is maintainable, Hubtown Limited v. IDBI Trusteeship
Service Ltd., 2016 SCC OnLine Bom 9019. ? Maintainability of
letters patent appeal.?On a careful reading of Section 50 of the
Arbitration Act, 1996, it is limpid that an appeal can lie if an order is
passed refusing to refer the parties to arbitration as engrafted under
Section 45 of the said Act or to enforce a foreign award as envisaged under
Section 48 of that Act. Further, on a perusal of
Section 13 (1) of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial
Appellate Division of the High Courts Act, 2015, it is crystal clear that an
appeal would lie if it is in accordance with the provisions of the said Act.
The said section has to be read in conjunction with Section 5 of the same
Act, which clearly lays down that a forum is created i.e Commercial Appellate
Division. Section 50(1)(b) of the Arbitration Act, 1996 provides for
an appeal. Section 50(1)(b) has not been amended by the Arbitration
and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 that has come into force on
23-10-2015. Thus, an appeal under Section 50(1)(b) of the Arbitration
Act, 1996 before the Division Bench is maintainable, Arun Dev
Upadhyaya v. Integrated Sales Service Ltd., (2016)
9 SCC 524. ? Summary Suit and
Summary Judgment.?Once summary suit as originally filed prior to
commencement of and as now transferred being commercial dispute matter. Original
procedure as provided under Order 37 CPC shall be applicable to such summary
suits. Parties are not entitled to prayer for summary judgment under Order
13-A CPC. Hence judgments and issues so decided in summary suit shall for all
purposes be governed by CPC even after such suits are transferred as
commercial suits. Commercial Division Judge is required to follow original
CPC and is required to keep in mind position in law revolving around all
facets of summary suits. Provisions of Section 13 is required to be
interpreted and/or considered accordingly when any decision is given by
Commercial Division/Court in such summary suit. Proviso to Section 13(1) will
not affect maintainability of such Appeal so filed against such
order/judgment passed by Commercial Division/Court in such summary
suit, Hubtown Limited v. IDBI Trusteeship Service
Ltd., 2016 SCC OnLine Bom 9019. ? Right to Appeal.?Appeal
is available if commercial suit/dispute is dealt with by Commercial
Division/Commercial Court and passes order/judgment and/or take decision.
This statutory Appeal as provided cannot be taken away. Notwithstanding
anything contained in any other law for time being in force or Letters Patent
of a High Court, Hubtown Limited v. IDBI Trusteeship
Service Ltd., 2016 SCC OnLine Bom 9019. |
14. Expeditious disposal of appeals.?
The [20]
[Commercial Appellate Court and the Commercial Appellate Division] shall
endeavour to dispose of appeals filed before it within a period of six months
from the date of filing of such appeal.
Chapter V
TRANSFER OF
PENDING SUITS
15. Transfer of pending cases.?
(1)
All
suits and applications, including applications under the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996 (26 of 1996), relating to a commercial dispute of a
Specified Value pending in a High Court where a Commercial Division has been
constituted, shall be transferred to the Commercial Division.
(2)
All
suits and applications, including applications under the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996 (26 of 1996), relating to a commercial dispute of a
specified value pending in any civil court in any district or area in respect
of which a Commercial Court has been constituted, shall be transferred to such
Commercial Court:
Provided that no suit or application where the
final judgment has been reserved by the court prior to the constitution of the
Commercial Division or the Commercial Court shall be transferred either under
sub-section (1) or sub-section (2).
(3)
Where
any suit or application, including an application under the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996 (26 of 1996), relating to a commercial dispute of
specified value shall stand transferred to the Commercial Division or
Commercial Court under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2), the provisions of
this Act shall apply to those procedures that were not complete at the time of
transfer.
(4)
The
Commercial Division or Commercial Court, as the case may be, may hold case
management hearings in respect of such transferred suit or application in order
to prescribe new timelines or issue such further directions as may be necessary
for a speedy and efficacious disposal of such suit or application in
accordance [21] [with Order XV-A] of the
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908):
Provided that the proviso to sub-rule (1) of Rule 1
of Order V of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) shall not apply to
such transferred suit or application and the court may, in its discretion,
prescribe a new time period within which the written statement shall be filed.
(5)
In
the event that such suit or application is not transferred in the manner
specified in sub-section (1), sub-section (2) or sub-section (3), the
Commercial Appellate Division of the High Court may, on the application of any
of the parties to the suit, withdraw such suit or application from the court
before which it is pending and transfer the same for trial or disposal to the
Commercial Division or Commercial Court, as the case may be, having territorial
jurisdiction over such suit, and such order of transfer shall be final and
binding.
Chapter VI
AMENDMENTS TO
THE PROVISIONS OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908
16. Amendments to the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in its application to commercial disputes.?
(1)
The
provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) shall, in their
application to any suit in respect of a commercial dispute of a Specified
Value, stand amended in the manner as specified in the Schedule.
(2)
The
Commercial Division and Commercial Court shall follow the provisions of the
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), as amended by this Act, in the trial
of a suit in respect of a commercial dispute of a specified value.
(3)
Where
any provision of any Rule of the jurisdictional High Court or any amendment to
the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the State Government is in conflict with
the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), as amended by
this Act, the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure as amended by this Act
shall prevail.
Chapter VII
MISCELLANEOUS
17. Collection and disclosure of data by[22] [Commercial Courts, Commercial Appellate Courts], Commercial Divisions and Commercial Appellate Divisions.?
The statistical data regarding the number of suits,
applications, appeals or writ petitions filed before the [23]
[Commercial Courts, Commercial Appellate Courts], Commercial Division, or
Commercial Appellate Division, as the case may be, the pendency of such cases,
the status of each case, and the number of cases disposed of, shall be
maintained and updated every month by each [24]
[Commercial Courts, Commercial Appellate Courts], Commercial Division,
Commercial Appellate Division and shall be published on the website of the
relevant High Court.
18. Power of High Court to issue directions.?
The High Court may, by notification, issue practice
directions to supplement the provisions of Chapter II of this Act or the Code
of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) insofar as such provisions apply to the
hearing of commercial disputes of a specified value.
19. Infrastructure facilities.?
The State Government shall provide necessary
infrastructure to facilitate the working of a Commercial Court or a Commercial
Division of a High Court.
|
? Transfer of
Commercial suits.?There is no scope to any authority not to transfer
commercial suits having one crore and above valuation for purpose of
pecuniary jurisdiction. All are bound by provisions including amended CPC to
expedite pending Suits filed prior or post Commercial Courts Act. Appeals are
also expedited by provisions so also pending Arbitration Petitions/Appeals as
specified though filed prior to enforcement of Commercial Courts Act, Hubtown
Limited v. IDBI Trusteeship Service Ltd., 2016 SCC
OnLine Bom 9019. |
20. Training and continuous education.?
The State Government may, in consultation with the
High Court, establish necessary facilities providing for training of Judges who
may be appointed to the [25]
[Commercial Courts, Commercial Appellate Courts], Commercial Division or the
Commercial Appellate Division in a High Court.
21. Act to have overriding effect.?
Save as otherwise provided, the
provisions of this Act shall have effect, notwithstanding anything inconsistent
therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or in any instrument
having effect by virtue of any law for the time being in force other than this
Act.
[26] [21-A. Power of Central Government to make rules.?
(1)
The
Central Government may, by notification, make rules for carrying out the
provisions of this Act.
(2)
In
particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power,
such rules may provide for or any of the following matters, namely?
(a)
the
manner and procedure of pre-institution mediation under sub-section (1) of
Section 12-A;
(b)
any
other matter which is required to be, or may be, prescribed or in respect of
which provision is to be made by rules made by the Central Government.
(3)
Every
rule made by the Central Government under this Act shall be laid, as soon as
may be after it is made, before each House of Parliament, while it is in
session, for a total period of thirty days which may be comprised in one
session, or in two or more successive sessions, and if, before the expiry of
the session immediately following the session or the successive sessions
aforesaid, both Houses agree in making any modification in the rule, or both
Houses agree that the rule should not be made, the rule shall thereafter have
effect only in such modified form or be of no effect, as the case may be; so,
however, that any such modification or annulment shall be without prejudice to
the validity of anything previously done under that rule.]
22. Power to remove difficulties.?
(1)
If
any difficulty arises in giving effect to the provisions of this Act, the
Central Government may, by order published in the Official Gazette, make such
provisions, not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act as may appear to
it to be necessary or expedient for removing the difficulty:
Provided that no such order shall be made under
this section after the expiry of a period of two years from the date of
commencement of this Act.
(2)
Every
order made under this section shall be laid, as soon as may be, after it is
made, before each House of Parliament.
23. Repeal and savings.?
(1)
The
Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of
High Courts Ordinance, 2015 (Ord. 8 of 2015) is hereby repealed.
(2)
Notwithstanding
such repeal, anything done or any action taken under the said Ordinance, shall
be deemed to have been done or taken under the corresponding provisions of this
Act.
SCHEDULE
(See Section 16)
1. Amendment of Section 26.?
In Section 26 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
(5 of 1908)(hereafter referred to as the Code), in sub-section (2), the
following proviso shall be inserted, namely?
?Provided that such an affidavit shall be in the
form and manner as prescribed under Order VI, Rule 15-A.?.
2. Substitution of new section for Section 35.?
For Section 35 of the Code, the following section
shall be substituted, namely?
?35. Costs.?(1) In relation to any
commercial dispute, the court, notwithstanding anything contained in any other
law for the time being in force or rule, has the discretion to determine:
(a)
whether
costs are payable by one party to another;
(b)
the
quantum of those costs; and
(c)
when
they are to be paid.
Explanation.?For the purpose of clause (a), the
expression ?costs? shall mean reasonable costs relating to?
(i)??? ?the
fees and expenses of the witnesses incurred;
(ii)
???legal fees and expenses incurred;
(iii)? ?any
other expenses incurred in connection with the proceedings.
(2) ??If the court decides to make an order for
payment of costs, the general rule is that the unsuccessful party shall be
ordered to pay the costs of the successful party:
Provided that the court may make an order deviating
from the general rule for reasons to be recorded in writing.
Illustration
The plaintiff, in his suit, seeks a money decree
for breach of contract, and damages. The court holds that the plaintiff is
entitled to the money decree. However, it returns a finding that the claim for
damages is frivolous and vexatious.
In such circumstances the court may impose costs on
the plaintiff, despite the plaintiff being the successful party, for having
raised frivolous claims for damages.
(3)?
?In making an order for the
payment of costs, the court shall have regard to the following circumstances,
including?
(a)
the
conduct of the parties;
(b)
whether
a party has succeeded on part of its case, even if that party has not been
wholly successful;
(c)
whether
the party had made a frivolous counter-claim leading to delay in the disposal
of the case;
(d)
whether
any reasonable offer to settle is made by a party and unreasonably refused by
the other party; and
(e)
whether
the party had made a frivolous claim and instituted a vexatious proceeding
wasting the time of the court.
(4) ???The orders which the court may make under
this provision include an order that a party must pay?
(a)
a
proportion of another party's costs;
(b)
a
stated amount in respect of another party's costs;
(c)
costs
from or until a certain date;
(d)
costs
incurred before proceedings have begun;
(e)
costs
relating to particular steps taken in the proceedings;
(f)
costs
relating to a distinct part of the proceedings; and
(g)
interest
on costs from or until a certain date.
3. Amendment of Section 35-A.?
In Section 35-A of the Code, sub-section (2) shall
be omitted.
4. Amendment of First Schedule.?
In the First Schedule to the Code,?
(A)
in
the Order V, in Rule 1, in sub-rule (1), for the second proviso, the following
proviso shall be substituted, namely?
?Provided further that where the defendant fails to
file the written statement within the said period of thirty days, he shall be
allowed to file the written statement on such other day, as may be specified by
the court, for reasons to be recorded in writing and on payment of such costs
as the court deems fit, but which shall not be later than one hundred twenty
days from the date of service of summons and on expiry of one hundred twenty
days from the date of service of summons, the defendant shall forfeit the right
to file the written statement and the court shall not allow the written
statement to be taken on record.?;
(B)
in
Order VI,?
(i)? ??after Rule 3, the following rule shall
be inserted, namely?
?3-A. Forms
of pleading in commercial courts.?In a commercial dispute, where forms
of pleadings have been prescribed under the High Court Rules or Practice
Directions made for the purposes of such commercial disputes, pleadings shall
be in such forms.?;
(ii) ???after Rule 15, the following rule shall
be inserted, namely?
?15-A. Verification
of pleadings in a Commercial Dispute.?(1) Notwithstanding anything
contained in Rule 15, every pleading in a commercial dispute shall be verified
by an affidavit in the manner and form prescribed in the Appendix to this
Schedule.
(2) ???An affidavit under sub-rule (1) above shall
be signed by the party or by one of the parties to the proceedings, or by any
other person on behalf of such party or parties who is proved to the
satisfaction of the court to be acquainted with the facts of the case and who
is duly authorised by such party or parties.
(3) ??Where a pleading is amended, the amendments
must be verified in the form and manner referred to in sub-rule (1) unless the
court orders otherwise.
(4) ??Where a pleading is not verified in the
manner provided under sub-rule (1), the party shall not be permitted to rely on
such pleading as evidence or any of the matters set out therein.
(5) ??The court may strike out a pleading which is
not verified by a Statement of Truth, namely, the affidavit set out in the
Appendix to this Schedule.?;
(C)
in
Order VII, after Rule 2, the following rule shall be inserted,
namely?
?2-A. Where interest is sought in the suit.?(1)
Where the plaintiff seeks interest, the plaint shall contain a statement to
that effect along with the details set out under sub-rules (2) and (3).
(2) ??Where the plaintiff seeks interest, the
plaint shall state whether the plaintiff is seeking interest in relation to a
commercial transaction within the meaning of Section 34 of the Code of Civil
Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) and, furthermore, if the plaintiff is doing so
under the terms of a contract or under an Act, in which case the Act is to be
specified in the plaint; or on some other basis and shall state the basis of
that.
(3) ??Pleadings shall also state?
(a)
the
rate at which interest is claimed;
(b)
the
date from which it is claimed;
(c)
the
date to which it is calculated;
(d)
the
total amount of interest claimed to the date of calculation; and
(e)
the
daily rate at which interest accrues after that date.?;
(D)
in
Order VIII,?
(i)??? ?in
Rule 1, for the proviso, the following proviso shall be substituted,
namely?
?Provided that where the defendant fails to file
the written statement within the said period of thirty days, he shall be
allowed to file the written statement on such other day, as may be specified by
the court, for reasons to be recorded in writing and on payment of such costs
as the court deems fit, but which shall not be later than one hundred twenty
days from the date of service of summons and on expiry of one hundred twenty days
from the date of service of summons, the defendant shall forfeit the right to
file the written statement and the court shall not allow the written statement
to be taken on record.?;
(ii)?? ?after
Rule 3, the following rule shall be inserted, namely?
?3-A. Denial by the defendant in suits
before the Commercial Division of the High Court or the Commercial Court.?(1)
Denial shall be in the manner provided in sub-rules (2), (3), (4) and (5) of
this rule.
(2) ??The defendant in his written statement shall
state which of the allegations in the particulars of plaint he denies, which
allegations he is unable to admit or deny, but which he requires the plaintiff
to prove, and which allegations he admits.
(3)?
?Where the defendant denies an
allegation of fact in a plaint, he must state his reasons for doing so and if
he intends to put forward a different version of events from that given by the
plaintiff, he must state his own version.
(4) ??If the defendant disputes the jurisdiction of
the court he must state the reasons for doing so, and if he is able, give his
own statement as to which court ought to have jurisdiction.
(5)?
?If the defendant disputes the
plaintiff's valuation of the suit, he must state his reasons for doing so, and
if he is able, give his own statement of the value of the suit.?;
(iii) ??in Rule 5, in sub-rule (1), after the first
proviso, the following proviso shall be inserted, namely?
?Provided further, that every allegation of fact in
the plaint, if not denied in the manner provided under Rule 3-A of this order,
shall be taken to be admitted except as against a person under disability.?;
(iv)? ?in
Rule 10, [27] [* * *], the following
proviso shall be inserted, namely?
?[28]
[Provided that] no court shall make an order to extend the time provided under
Rule 1 of this order for filing of the written statement.?;
(E)
for
Order XI of the Code, the following order shall be substituted,
namely?
?ORDER XI
DISCLOSURE, DISCOVERY AND INSPECTION OF
DOCUMENTS IN SUITS BEFORE THE COMMERCIAL DIVISION OF A HIGH COURT OR A
COMMERCIAL COURT
1.
Disclosure
and discovery of documents.?(1)
Plaintiff shall file a list of all documents and photocopies of all documents,
in its power, possession, control or custody, pertaining to the suit, along
with the plaint, including:
(a)
Documents
referred to and relied on by the plaintiff in the plaint;
(b)
Documents
relating to any matter in question in the proceedings, in the power,
possession, control or custody of the plaintiff, as on the date of filing the
plaint, irrespective of whether the same is in support of or adverse to the
plaintiffs case;
(c)
nothing
in this rule shall apply to documents produced by plaintiffs and relevant only?
(i) ????for the cross-examination of the
defendant's witnesses, or
(ii) ???in answer to any case setup by the defendant
subsequent to the filing of the plaint, or
(iii)? ?handed
over to a witness merely to refresh his memory.
(2) The list of documents filed with the plaint
shall specify whether the documents in the power, possession, control or
custody of the plaintiff are originals, office copies or photocopies and the
list shall also set out in brief, details of parties to each document, mode of
execution, issuance or receipt and line of custody of each document.
(3) The plaint shall contain a declaration on oath
from the plaintiff that all documents in the power, possession, control or
custody of the plaintiff, pertaining to the facts and circumstances of the
proceedings initiated by him have been disclosed and copies thereof annexed
with the plaint, and that the plaintiff does not have any other documents in
its power, possession, control or custody.
Explanation.?A declaration on oath under this sub-rule shall
be contained in the Statement of Truth as set out in the Appendix.
(4) In case of urgent filings, the plaintiff may
seek leave to rely on additional documents, as part of the above declaration on
oath and subject to grant of such leave by court, the plaintiff shall file such
additional documents in court, within thirty days of filing the suit, along
with a declaration on oath that the plaintiff has produced all documents in its
power, possession, control or custody, pertaining to the facts and
circumstances of the proceedings initiated by the plaintiff and that the
plaintiff does not have any other documents, in its power, possession, control
or custody.
(5) The plaintiff shall not be allowed to rely on
documents, which were in the plaintiff's power, possession, control or custody
and not disclosed along with plaint or within the extended period set out
above, save and except by leave of court and such leave shall be granted only
upon the plaintiff establishing reasonable cause for non-disclosure along with
the plaint.
(6) The plaint shall set out details of documents,
which the plaintiff believes to be in the power, possession, control or custody
of the defendant and which the plaintiff wishes to rely upon and seek leave for
production thereof by the said defendant.
(7) The defendant shall file a list of all
documents and photocopies of all documents, in its power, possession, control
or custody, pertaining to the suit, along with the written statement or with
its counter-claim if any, including?
(a)
the
documents referred to and relied on by the defendant in the written statement;
(b)
the
documents relating to any matter in question in the proceeding in the power,
possession, control or custody of the defendant, irrespective of whether the
same is in support of or adverse to the defendant's defense;
(c)
nothing
in this rule shall apply to documents produced by the defendants and relevant
only?
(i) ????for the cross-examination of the
plaintiff's witnesses,
(ii)?? ?in
answer to any case setup by the plaintiff subsequent to the filing of the
plaint, or
(iii) ??handed over to a witness merely to refresh
his memory.
(8) The list of documents filed with the written
statement or counter-claim shall specify whether the documents, in the power,
possession, control or custody of the defendant, are originals, office copies
or photocopies and the list shall also set out in brief, details of parties to
each document being produced by the defendant, mode of execution, issuance or
receipt and line of custody of each document;
(9) The written statement or counter-claim shall
contain a declaration on oath made by the deponent that all documents in the
power, possession, control or custody of the defendant, save and except for
those set out in sub-rule (7)(c)(iii), pertaining to the facts
and circumstances of the proceedings initiated by the plaintiff or in the
counter-claim, have been disclosed and copies thereof annexed with the written
statement or counter-claim and that the defendant does not have in its power,
possession, control or custody, any other documents;
(10) Save and except for sub-rule (7)(c)(iii),
defendant shall not be allowed to rely on documents, which were in the
defendant's power, possession, control or custody and not disclosed along with
the written statement or counter-claim, save and except by leave of court and
such leave shall be granted only upon the defendant establishing reasonable
cause for non-disclosure along with the written statement or counter-claim;
(11) The written statement or counter-claim shall
set out details of documents in the power, possession, control or custody of
the plaintiff, which the defendant wishes to rely upon and which have not been
disclosed with the plaint, and call upon the plaintiff to produce the same;
(12) Duty to disclose documents, which have come to
the notice of a party, shall continue till disposal of the suit.
2.
Discovery
by Interrogatories.?(1)
In any suit the plaintiff or defendant by leave of the court may deliver interrogatories
in writing for the examination of the opposite parties or anyone or more of
such parties, and such interrogatories when delivered shall have a note at the
foot thereof stating which of such interrogatories each of such persons is
required to answer:
Provided that no party shall deliver more than one
set of interrogatories to the same party without an order for that purpose:
Provided further that interrogatories which do not
relate to any matters in question in the suit shall be deemed irrelevant,
notwithstanding that they might be admissible on the oral cross-examination of
a witness.
(2) On an application for leave to deliver
interrogatories, the particular interrogatories proposed to be delivered shall
be submitted to the court, and that court shall decide within seven days from
the day of filing of the said application, in deciding upon such application,
the court shall take into account any offer, which may be made by the party
sought to be interrogated to deliver particulars, or to make admissions, or to
produce documents relating to the matters in question, or any of them, and
leave shall be given as to such only of the interrogatories submitted as the
court shall consider necessary either for disposing fairly of the suit or for
saving costs.
(3) In adjusting the costs of the suit inquiry
shall at the instance of any party be made into the propriety of exhibiting
such interrogatories, and if it is the opinion of the taxing officer or of the
court, either with or without an application for inquiry, that such
interrogatories have been exhibited unreasonably, vexatiously, or at improper
length, the costs occasioned by the said interrogatories and the answers
thereto shall be paid in any event by the party in fault.
(4) Interrogatories shall be in the form provided
in Form No. 2 in Appendix C to the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908),
with such variations as circumstances may require.
(5) Where any party to a suit is a corporation or a
body of persons, whether incorporated or not, empowered by law to sue or be
sued, whether in its own name or in the name of any officer of other person,
any opposite party may apply for an order allowing him to deliver
interrogatories to any member or officer of such corporation or body, and an
order may be made accordingly.
(6) Any objection to answering any interrogatory on
the ground that it is scandalous or irrelevant or not exhibited bona fide for
the purpose of the suit, or that the matters inquired into are not sufficiently
material at that stage, or on the ground of privilege or any other ground may
be taken in the affidavit in answer.
(7) Any interrogatories may be set aside on the
ground that they have been exhibited unreasonably or vexatiously, or struck out
on the ground that they are prolix, oppressive, unnecessary or scandalous and
any application for this purpose may be made within seven days after service of
the interrogatories.
(8) Interrogatories shall be answered by affidavit
to be filed within ten days, or within such other time as the court may allow.
(9) An affidavit in answer to interrogatories shall
be in the form provided in Form No. 3 in Appendix C to the Code of Civil Procedure,
1908 (5 of 1908), with such variations as circumstances may require.
(10) No exceptions shall be taken to any affidavit
in answer, but the sufficiency or otherwise of any such affidavit objected to
as insufficient shall be determined by the court.
(11) Where any person interrogated omits to answer,
or answers insufficiently, the party interrogating may apply to the court for
an order requiring him to answer, or to answer further, as the case may be, and
an order may be made requiring him to answer, or to answer further, either
affidavit or by viva voce examination, as the court may direct.
3.
Inspection.?(1) All parties shall complete inspection of all
documents disclosed within thirty days of the date of filing of the written
statement or written statement to the counter-claim, whichever is later. The
court may extend this time limit upon application at its discretion, but not
beyond thirty days in any event.
(2) Any party to the proceedings may seek
directions from the court, at any stage of the proceedings, for inspection or
production of documents by the other party, of which inspection has been
refused by such party or documents have not been produced despite issuance of a
notice to produce.
(3) Order in such application shall be disposed of
within thirty days of filing such application, including filing replies and
rejoinders (if permitted by court) and hearing.
(4) If the above application is allowed, inspection
and copies thereof shall be furnished to the party seeking it, within five days
of such order.
(5) No party shall be permitted to rely on a
document, which it had failed to disclose or of which inspection has not been
given, save and except with leave of court.
(6) The Court may impose exemplary costs against a
defaulting party, who wilfully or negligently failed to disclose all documents
pertaining to a suit or essential for a decision therein and which are in their
power, possession, control or custody or where a court holds that inspection or
copies of any documents had been wrongfully or unreasonably withheld or
refused.
4.
Admission
and denial of documents.?(1)
Each party shall submit a statement of admissions or denials of all documents
disclosed and of which inspection has been completed, within fifteen days of
the completion of inspection or any later date as fixed by the court.
(2) The statement of admissions and denials shall
set out explicitly, whether such party was admitting or denying:
(a)
correctness
of contents of a document;
(b)
existence
of a document;
(c)
execution
of a document;
(d)
issuance
or receipt of a document;
(e)
custody
of a document.
Explanation.?A statement of admission or denial of the
existence of a document made in accordance with sub-rule (2)(b) shall
include the admission or denial of the contents of a document.
(3) Each party shall set out reasons for denying a
document under any of the above grounds and bare and unsupported denials shall
not be deemed to be denials of a document and proof of such documents may then
be dispensed with at the discretion of the court.
(4) Any party may however submit bare denials for
third party documents of which the party denying does not have any personal
knowledge of, and to which the party denying is not a party to in any manner
whatsoever.
(5) An Affidavit in support of the statement of
admissions and denials shall be filed confirming the correctness of the
contents of the statement.
(6) In the event that the court holds that any
party has unduly refused to admit a document under any of the above criteria,
costs (including exemplary costs) for deciding on admissibility of a document
may be imposed by the court on such party.
(7) The court may pass orders with respect to
admitted documents including for waiver of further proof thereon or rejection
of any documents.
5.
Production
of documents.?(1) Any party to a
proceeding may seek or the court may order, at any time during the pendency of
any suit, production by any party or person, of such documents in the
possession or power of such party or person, relating to any matter in question
in such suit.
(2) Notice to produce such document shall be issued
in the form provided in Form No. 7 in Appendix C to the Code of Civil
Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908).
(3) Any party or person to whom such notice to
produce is issued shall be given not less than seven days and not more than
fifteen days to produce such document or to answer to their inability to
produce such document.
(4) The court may draw an adverse inference against
a party refusing to produce such document after issuance of a notice to produce
and where sufficient reasons for such non-production are not given and order
costs.
6.
Electronic
Records.?(1) In case of disclosures and
inspection of electronic records [as defined in the Information Technology Act,
2000 (21 of 2000)], furnishing of printouts shall be sufficient compliance of
the above provisions.
(2) At the discretion of the parties or where
required (when parties wish to rely on audio or video content), copies of
electronic records may be furnished in electronic form either in addition to or
in lieu of printouts.
(3) Where electronic records form part of documents
disclosed, the declaration on oath to be filed by a party shall specify?
(a)
the
parties to such electronic record;
(b)
the
manner in which such electronic record was produced and by whom;
(c)
the
dates and time of preparation or storage or issuance or receipt of each such
electronic record;
(d)
the
source of such electronic record and date and time when the electronic record
was printed;
(e)
in
case of e-mail ids, details of ownership, custody and access to such e-mail
ids;
(f)
in
case of documents stored on a computer or computer resource (including on
external servers or cloud), details of ownership, custody and access to such
data on the computer or computer resource;
(g)
deponent's
knowledge of contents and correctness of contents;
(h)
whether
the computer or computer resource used for preparing or receiving or storing
such document or data was functioning properly or in case of malfunction that
such malfunction did not affect the contents of the document stored;
(i)
that
the printout or copy furnished was taken from the original computer or computer
resource.
(4) The parties relying on printouts or copy in
electronic form, of any electronic records, shall not be required to give
inspection of electronic records, provided a declaration is made by such party
that each such copy, which has been produced, has been made from the original
Electronic Record.
(5) The court may give directions for admissibility
of electronic records at any stage of the proceedings.
(6) Any party may seek directions from the court
and the court may of its motion issue directions for submission of further
proof of any electronic record including metadata or logs before admission of
such electronic record.
7.
Certain
provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 not to apply.?For avoidance of doubt, it is hereby clarified
that Order XIII, Rule 1, Order VII, Rule 14 and Order VIII, Rule 1-A the Code
of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) shall not apply to suits or applications
before the Commercial Divisions of High Court or commercial courts.?.
5. Insertion of new Order XIII-A.?
After Order XIII of the Code, the following order
shall be inserted, namely?
?ORDER XIII-A
Summary
Judgment
1.
Scope
of and classes of suits to which this order applies.?(1) This order sets out the procedure by which
courts may decide a claim pertaining to any Commercial Dispute without
recording oral evidence.
(2) For the purposes of this order, the word
?claim? shall include?
(a)
part
of a claim;
(b)
any
particular question on which the claim (whether in whole or in part) depends;
or
(c)
a
counter-claim, as the case may be.
(3) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, an
application for summary judgment under this order shall not be made in a suit
in respect of any Commercial Dispute that is originally filed as a summary suit
under Order XXXVII.
2.
Stage
for application for summary judgment.?An applicant may apply for summary judgment at
any time after summons has been served on the defendant:
Provided that, no application for summary judgment
may be made by such applicant after the court has framed the issues in respect
of the suit.
3.
Grounds
for summary judgment.?The
court may give a summary judgment against a plaintiff or defendant on a claim
if it considers that?
(a)
the
plaintiff has no real prospect of succeeding on the claim or the defendant has
no real prospect of successfully defending the claim, as the case may be; and
(b)
there
is no other compelling reason why the claim should not be disposed of before
recording of oral evidence.
4.
Procedure.?(1) An application for summary judgment to a
court shall, in addition to any other matters the applicant may deem relevant,
include the matters set forth in sub-clauses (a) to (f) mentioned
hereunder:
(a)
the
application must contain a statement that it is an application for summary
judgment made under this order;
(b)
the
application must precisely disclose all material facts and identify the point
of law, if any;
(c)
in
the event the applicant seeks to rely upon any documentary evidence, the
applicant must,?
(i) ????include such documentary evidence in its
application, and
(ii) ???identify the relevant content of such
documentary evidence on which the applicant relies;
(d)
the
application must state the reason why there are no real prospects of succeeding
on the claim or defending the claim, as the case may be;
(e)
the
application must state what relief the applicant is seeking and briefly state
the grounds for seeking such relief.
(2) Where a hearing for summary judgment is fixed,
the respondent must be given at least thirty days' notice of?
(a)
the
date fixed for the hearing; and
(b)
the
claim that is proposed to be decided by the court at such hearing.
(3) The respondent may, within thirty days of the
receipt of notice of application of summary judgment or notice of hearing
(whichever is earlier), file a reply addressing the matters set forth in
clauses (a) to (f) mentioned hereunder in addition to any other
matters that the respondent may deem relevant:
(a)
the
reply must precisely?
(i) ???disclose all material facts;
(ii)?? ?identify the point of law, if any; and
(iii) ??state the reasons why the relief sought by
the applicant should not be granted;
(b)
in
the event the respondent seeks to rely upon any documentary evidence in its
reply, the respondent must?
(i)?? ?include such documentary evidence in its
reply; and
(ii) ??identify the relevant content of such
documentary evidence on which the respondent relies;
(c)
the
reply must state the reason why there are real prospects of succeeding on the
claim or defending the claim, as the case may be;
(d)
the
reply must concisely state the issues that should be framed for trial;
(e)
the
reply must identify what further evidence shall be brought on record at trial
that could not be brought on record at the stage of summary judgment; and
(f)
the
reply must state why, in light of the evidence or material on record if any,
the Court should not proceed to summary judgment.
5.
Evidence
for hearing of summary judgment.?(1)
Notwithstanding anything in this order, if the respondent in an application for
summary judgment wishes to rely on additional documentary evidence during the
hearing, the respondent must:
(a)
file
such documentary evidence; and
(b)
serve
copies of such documentary evidence on every other party to the application at
least fifteen days prior to the date of the hearing.
(2) Notwithstanding anything in this order, if the
applicant for summary judgment wishes to rely on documentary evidence in reply
to the defendant's documentary evidence, the applicant must:
(a)
file
such documentary evidence in reply; and
(b)
serve
a copy of such documentary evidence on the respondent at least five days prior
to the date of the hearing.
(3) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary,
sub-rules (1) and (2) shall not require documentary evidence to be:
(a)
filed
if such documentary evidence has already been filed; or
(b)
served
on a party on whom it has already been served.
6.
Orders
that may be made by court.?(1)
On an application made under this order, the court may make such orders that it
may deem fit in its discretion including the following?
(a)
judgment
on the claim;
(b)
conditional
order in accordance with Rule 7 mentioned hereunder;
(c)
dismissing
the application;
(d)
dismissing
part of the claim and a judgment on part of the claim that is not dismissed;
(e)
striking
out the pleadings (whether in whole or in part); or
(f)
further
directions to proceed for case management under Order XV-A.
(2) Where the court makes any of the orders as set
forth in sub-rule (1)(a) to (f), the court shall record its
reasons for making such order.
7.
Conditional
order.?(1) Where it appears to the court
that it is possible that a claim or defence may succeed but it is improbable
that it shall do so, the court may make a conditional order as set forth in
Rule 6(1)(b) above.
(2) Where the court makes a conditional order, it
may:
(a)
make
it subject to all or any of the following conditions:
(i) ????require a party to deposit a sum of money
in the court;
(ii) ???require a party to take a specified step in
relation to the claim or defence, as the case may be;
(iii) ??require a party, as the case may be, to give
such security or provide such surety for restitution of costs as the court
deems fit and proper;
(iv)? ?impose
such other conditions, including providing security for restitution of losses
that any party is likely to suffer during the pendency of the suit, as the
court may deem fit in its discretion; and
(b)
specify
the consequences of the failure to comply with the conditional order, including
passing a judgment against the party that have not complied with the
conditional order.
8.
Power
to impose costs.?The court may make
an order for payment of costs in an application for summary judgment in
accordance with the provisions of Sections 35 and 35-A of the Code.?.
6. Omission of Order XV.?
Order XV of the Code shall be omitted.
7. Insertion of Order XV-A.?
After Order XV of the
Code, the following order shall be inserted, namely?
?ORDER XV-A
Case Management Hearing
1.
First Case Management Hearing.?The court shall hold the
first Case Management Hearing, not later than four weeks from the date of
filing of affidavit of admission or denial of documents by all parties to the
suit.
2.
Orders to be passed in a Case Management Hearing.?In a Case Management
Hearing, after hearing the parties, and once it finds that there are issues of
fact and law which require to be tried, the court may pass an order?
(a)
framing the issues between the parties in
accordance with Order XIV of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908)
after examining pleadings, documents and documents produced before it, and on
examination conducted by the court under Rule 2 of Order X, if required;
(b)
listing witnesses to be examined by the parties;
(c)
fixing the date by which affidavit of evidence to
be filed by parties;
(d)
fixing the date on which evidence of the witnesses
of the parties to be recorded;
(e)
fixing the date by which written arguments are to
be filed before the court by the parties;
(f)
fixing the date on which oral arguments are to be
heard by the court; and
(g)
setting time limits for parties and their advocates
to address oral arguments.
3.
Time limit for the completion of a trial.?In fixing dates or
setting time limits for the purposes of Rule 2 of this order, the court shall
ensure that the arguments are closed not later than six months from the date of
the first Case Management Hearing.
4.
Recording of oral evidence on a day-to-day basis.?The court shall, as far
as possible, ensure that the recording of evidence shall be carried on, on a
day-to-day basis until the cross examination of all the witnesses is complete.
5.
Case Management Hearings during a trial.?The court may, if
necessary, also hold Case Management Hearings anytime during the trial to issue
appropriate orders so as to ensure adherence by the parties to the dates fixed
under Rule 2 and facilitate speedy disposal of the suit.
6.
Powers of the court in a Case Management Hearing.?(1) In any Case
Management Hearing held under this order, the court shall have the power to?
(a)
prior to the framing of issues, hear and decide any
pending application filed by the parties under Order XIII-A;
(b)
direct parties to file compilations of documents or
pleadings relevant and necessary for framing issues;
(c)
extend or shorten the time for compliance with any
practice, direction or court order if it finds sufficient reason to do so;
(d)
adjourn or bring forward a hearing if it finds
sufficient reason to do so;
(e)
direct a party to attend the court for the purposes
of examination under Rule 2 of Order X;
(f)
consolidate proceedings;
(g)
strike off the name of any witness or evidence that
it deems irrelevant to the issues framed;
(h)
direct a separate trial of any issue;
(i)
decide the order in which issues are to be tried;
(j)
exclude an issue from consideration;
(k)
dismiss or give judgment on a claim after a
decision on a preliminary issue;
(l)
direct that evidence be recorded by a Commission
where necessary in accordance with Order XXVI;
(m)
reject any affidavit of evidence filed by the
parties for containing irrelevant, inadmissible or argumentative material;
(n)
strike off any parts of the affidavit of evidence
filed by the parties containing irrelevant, inadmissible or argumentative
material;
(o)
delegate the recording of evidence to such
authority appointed by the court for this purpose;
(p)
pass any order relating to the monitoring of
recording the evidence by a commission or any other authority;
(q)
order any party to file and exchange a costs
budget;
(r)
issue directions or pass any order for the purpose
of managing the case and furthering the overriding objective of ensuring the
efficient disposal of the suit.
(2) When the court passes
an order in exercise of its powers under this order, it may?
(a)
make it subject to conditions, including a
condition to pay a sum of money into court; and
(b)
specify the consequence of failure to comply with
the order or a condition.
(3) While fixing the date
for a Case Management Hearing, the court may direct that the parties also be
present for such Case Management Hearing, if it is of the view that there is a
possibility of settlement between the parties.
7.
Adjournment of Case Management Hearing.?(1) The court shall not
adjourn the Case Management Hearing for the sole reason that the advocate
appearing on behalf of a party is not present:
Provided that an
adjournment of the hearing is sought in advance by moving an application, the
court may adjourn the hearing to another date upon the payment of such costs as
the court deems fit, by the party moving such application.
(2) Notwithstanding
anything contained in this rule, if the court is satisfied that there is a
justified reason for the absence of the advocate, it may adjourn the hearing to
another date upon such terms and conditions it deems fit.
8.
Consequences of non-compliance with orders.?Where any party fails to
comply with the order of the court passed in a Case Management Hearing, the
court shall have the power to?
(a)
condone such non-compliance by payment of costs to
the court;
(b)
foreclose the non-compliant party's right to file
affidavits, conduct cross-examination of witnesses, file written submissions,
address oral arguments or make further arguments in the trial, as the case may
be, or
(c)
dismiss the plaint or allow the suit where such
non-compliance is wilful, repeated and the imposition of costs is not adequate
to ensure compliance.?.
8. Amendment of Order XVIII.?
In Order XVIII of the
Code, in Rule 2, for sub-rules (3-A), (3-B), (3-C), (3-D), (3-E) and (3-F), the
following shall be substituted, namely?
?(3-A) A party
shall, within four weeks prior to commencing the oral arguments, submit
concisely and under distinct headings written arguments in support of his case
to the court and such written arguments shall form part of the record.
(3-B) The
written arguments shall clearly indicate the provisions of the laws being cited
in support of the arguments and the citations of judgments being relied upon by
the party and include copies of such judgments being relied upon by the party.
(3-C) A copy
of such written arguments shall be furnished simultaneously to the opposite
party.
(3-D) The
court may, if it deems fit, after the conclusion of arguments, permit the parties
to file revised written arguments within a period of not more than one week
after the date of conclusion of arguments.
(3-E) No
adjournment shall be granted for the purpose of filing the written arguments
unless the court, for reasons to be recorded in writing, considers it necessary
to grant such adjournment.
(3-F) It shall
be open for the court to limit the time for oral submissions having regard to
the nature and complexity of the matter.?.
9. Amendment of Order XVIII.?
In Order XVIII of the
Code, in Rule 4, after sub-rule (1), the following sub-rules shall be inserted,
namely?
?(1-A) The
affidavits of evidence of all witnesses whose evidence is proposed to be led by
a party shall be filed simultaneously by that party at the time directed in the
first Case Management Hearing.
(1-B) A party
shall not lead additional evidence by the affidavit of any witness (including
of a witness who has already filed an affidavit) unless sufficient cause is
made out in an application for that purpose and an order, giving reasons,
permitting such additional affidavit is passed by the court.
(1-C) A party
shall however have the right to withdraw any of the affidavits so filed at any
time prior to commencement of cross-examination of that witness, without any adverse
inference being drawn based on such withdrawal:
Provided that any other
party shall be entitled to tender as evidence and rely upon any admission made
in such withdrawn affidavit.?.
10. Amendment to Order XIX.?
In Order XIX of the Code,
after Rule 3, the following rules shall be inserted, namely?
?4. Court may
control evidence.?(1) The court may, by directions, regulate the evidence
as to issues on which it requires evidence and the manner in which such
evidence may be placed before the court.
(2) The court may, in its
discretion and for reasons to be recorded in writing, exclude evidence that
would otherwise be produced by the parties.
5. Redacting or
rejecting evidence.?A court may, in its discretion, for reasons to be
recorded in writing?
(i)??? ?redact or order the redaction of such portions
of the affidavit of examination-in-chief as do not, in its view, constitute
evidence; or
(ii) ???return or reject an affidavit of
examination-in-chief as not constituting admissible evidence.
6. Format and
guidelines of affidavit of evidence.?An affidavit must comply with the form
and requirements set forth below:
(a)
such affidavit should be confined to, and should
follow the chronological sequence of, the dates and events that are relevant
for proving any fact or any other matter dealt with;
(b)
where the court is of the view that an affidavit is
a mere reproduction of the pleadings, or contains the legal grounds of any
party's case, the court may, by order, strike out the affidavit or such parts
of the affidavit, as it deems fit and proper;
(c)
each paragraph of an affidavit should, as far as
possible, be confined to a distinct portion of the subject;
(d)
an affidavit shall state?
(i)??? ?which of the statements in it are made from
the deponent's own knowledge and which are matters of information or belief;
and
(ii) ??the source for any matters of information or
belief.
(e)
an affidavit should?
(i) ????have the pages numbered consecutively as a
separate document (or as one of several documents contained in a file);
(ii) ???be divided into numbered paragraphs;
(iii)? ?have
all numbers, including dates, expressed in figures; and
(iv) ??if any of the documents referred to in the
body of the affidavit are annexed to the affidavit or any other pleadings, give
the annexures and page numbers of such documents that are relied upon.?.
11. Amendment of Order XX.?
In Order XX of the Code,
for Rule 1, the following rule shall be substituted, namely?
?(1) The [29]
[Commercial Court, Commercial Appellate Court], Commercial Division, or
Commercial Appellate Division, as the case may be, shall, within ninety days of
the conclusion of arguments, pronounce judgment and copies thereof shall be
issued to all the parties to the dispute through electronic mail or
otherwise.?.
[30] [12.After Appendix H, the following Appendix shall beinserted, namely?
APPENDIX I
STATEMENT OF
TRUTH
(Under First
Schedule, Order VI-Rule 15A and Order XI-Rule 3)
I ?? the deponent do
hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under:
1.
I am the party in the above suit and competent to
swear this affidavit.
2.
I am sufficiently conversant with the facts of the
case and have also examined all relevant documents and records in relation
thereto.
3.
I say that the statements made in ??paragraphs are
true to my knowledge and statements made in ??paragraphs are based on
information received which I believe to be correct and statements made in
?paragraphs are based on legal advice.
4.
I say that there is no false statement or
concealment of any material fact, document or record and I have included
information that is according to me, relevant for the present suit.
5.
I say that all documents in my power, possession,
control or custody, pertaining to the facts and circumstances of the
proceedings initiated by me have been disclosed and copies thereof annexed with
the plaint, and that I do not have any other documents in my power, possession,
control or custody.
6.
I say that the above-mentioned pleading comprises
of a total of ?? pages, each of which has been duly signed by me.
7.
I state that the Annexures hereto are true copies
of the documents referred to and relied upon by me.
8.
I say that I am aware that for any false statement
or concealment, I shall be liable for action taken against me under the law for
the time being in force.
Place:
Date:
Deponent
VERIFICATION
I, ?????????. do hereby
declare that the statements made above are true to my knowledge.
Verified at [place] on
this [date]
Deponent.]
[1] Ins. by Act 28 of 2018, S. 2 (w.r.e.f. 3-5-2018).
[2] Subs. by Act 28 of 2018, S. 3 (w.r.e.f.
3-5-2018). Prior to substitution it read as:
?(1) This Act may be
called the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate
Division of High Courts Act, 2015.?
[3] The words ?except the State of Jammu and Kashmir? omitted by
Act 34 of 2019, Ss. 95, 96 and Sch. V (w.e.f. 31-10-2019).
[4] Ins. by Act 28 of 2018, S. 4(I) (w.r.e.f. 3-5-2018).
[5] Renumbered by Act 28 of 2018, S. 4(I) (w.r.e.f. 3-5-2018).
[6] Subs. for ?which shall not be less than one crore rupees? by Act 28 of
2018, S. 4(II) (w.r.e.f. 3-5-2018).
[7] Subs. by Act 28 of 2018, S. 5 (w.r.e.f.
3-5-2018). Prior to substitution it read as:
?CONSTITUTION OF
COMMERCIAL COURTS, COMMERCIAL DIVISIONS AND COMMERCIAL APPELLATE DIVISIONS?
[8] Subs. by Act 28 of 2018, S. 6(a)
(w.r.e.f. 3-5-2018). Prior to substitution it read as:
?Provided that no
Commercial Court shall be constituted for the territory over which the High
Court has ordinary original civil jurisdiction.?
[9] Ins. by Act 28 of 2018, S. 6(b)
(w.r.e.f. 3-5-2018).
[10] Subs. for ?State Government shall? by
Act 28 of 2018, S. 6(c)(i) (w.r.e.f. 3-5-2018).
[11] Subs. for ?Commercial Court, from amongst the cadre of Higher Judicial
Service in the State? by Act 28 of 2018, S. 6(c)(ii) (w.r.e.f.
3-5-2018).
[12] Ins. by Act 28 of 2018, S. 7 (w.r.e.f. 3-5-2018).
[13] Subs. for ?ordinary civil jurisdiction? by Act 28 of 2018, S. 8
(w.r.e.f. 3-5-2018).
[14] Omitted by Act 28 of 2018, S. 9 (w.r.e.f.
3-5-2018). Prior to omission it read as:
?9. Transfer
of suit if counter-claim in a commercial dispute is of Specified Value.?(1)
Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of
1908), in the event that a counter-claim filed in a suit before a civil court
relating to a commercial dispute is of specified value, such suit shall be transferred
by the civil court to the Commercial Division or Commercial Court, as the case
may be, having territorial jurisdiction over such suit.
(2) In the event that
such suit is not transferred in the manner contemplated in sub-section (1), the
Commercial Appellate Division of the High Court exercising supervisory
jurisdiction over the civil court in question may, on the application of any of
the parties to the suit, withdraw such suit pending before the civil court and
transfer the same for trial or disposal to the Commercial Court or Commercial
Division or, as the case may be, having territorial jurisdiction over such
suit, and such order of transfer shall be final and binding.?
[15] Ins. by Act 28 of 2018, S. 10(i)
(w.r.e.f. 3-5-2018).
[16] The words ?and? omitted by Act 28 of 2018, S. 10(ii)
(w.r.e.f. 3-5-2018).
[17] Omitted by Act 28 of 2018, S. 10(iii)
(w.r.e.f. 3-5-2018). Prior to omission it read as:
?(e) where the
counter-claim is raised in any suit, appeal or application, the value of the
subject-matter of the commercial dispute in such counter-claim as on the date
of the counter-claim shall be taken into account.?
[18] Ins. by Act 28 of 2018, S. 11 (w.r.e.f. 3-5-2018).
[19] Subs. by Act 28 of 2018, S. 12
(w.r.e.f. 3-5-2018). Prior to substitution it read as:
?(1) Any person
aggrieved by the decision of the Commercial Court or Commercial Division of a
High Court may appeal to the Commercial Appellate Division of that High Court
within a period of sixty days from the date of judgment or order, as the case
may be:
Provided that an
appeal shall lie from such orders passed by a Commercial Division or a
Commercial Court that are specifically enumerated under Order XLIII of the Code
of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) as amended by this Act and Section 37 of
the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (26 of 1996).?
[20] Subs. for ?Commercial Appellate Division? by Act 28 of 2018, S. 13
(w.r.e.f. 3-5-2018).
[21] Subs. for ?with Order XIV-A? by Act 28 of 2018, S. 14 (w.r.e.f.
3-5-2018).
[22] Subs. for ?Commercial Courts? by Act 28 of 2018, S. 15 (w.r.e.f.
3-5-2018).
[23] Subs. for ?Commercial Court? by Act 28 of 2018, S. 15 (w.r.e.f.
3-5-2018).
[24] Subs. for ?Commercial Court? by Act 28 of 2018, S. 15 (w.r.e.f.
3-5-2018).
[25] Subs. for ?Commercial Court? by Act 28 of 2018, S. 16 (w.r.e.f.
3-5-2018).
[26] Ins. by Act 28 of 2018, S. 17 (w.r.e.f. 3-5-2018).
[27] The words ?after the first proviso? omitted by Act 28
of 2018, S. 18(i)(a) (w.r.e.f. 3-5-2018).
[28] Subs. for ?Provided further that? by
Act 28 of 2018, S. 18(i)(b) (w.r.e.f. 3-5-2018).
[29] Subs. for ?Commercial Court? by Act 28 of 2018, S. 18(ii)
(w.r.e.f. 3-5-2018).
[30] Ins. by Act 28 of 2018, S. 18(iii) (w.r.e.f. 23-10-2015).